And one of the dangers here is that people get used to settling for 'good enough', without any human finesse and creativity to take the image to the next level.

In more prosaic terms (literally), I find this in my job as a translator. Neural machine translation can these days often produce 'good enough' results. There may be a hundred things that are slightly off, clunky, inelegant. But changing them all, one by one, would not be cost-effective. So they are left there.

And ultimately that debases the language, and permanently lowers expectations of what could be achieved.

Mozart is deleted from history, and replaced with Salieri. No one even notices, and eventually no one even can notice, because the reference points have shifted, the window of expression has narrowed.

In a photo shoot, the photographer is interacting with the model, talking to them, making suggestions, eliciting reactions.

Every one of those human interactions is capable of sparking a moment of wonder, an expression, a look in the eyes shining with inner feeling.

Lose that, and all you end up with is a flight attendant's fixed grin and cheery 'Welcome aboard!'.