Thanks for the corroboration from a more technical background. I do find it amazing that as a humanities graduate, with nothing more than an amateur interest in science, I'm picking up these errors, and spotting that if they said 1.020, and then 1,134 in the same context, for figures that must be of similar magnitude, they've mixed their separators. If I just did my actual job of translating what they - the specialists - have put, it's bye-bye satellite!